Making fun of music, one song at a time. Since the year 2000.
Check out the two amIright misheard lyrics books including one book devoted to misheard lyrics of the 1980s.
(Toggle Right Side Navigation)

Song Parodies -> "The Amiright One-ster"

Original Song Title:

"The Beverly Hillbillies"

Original Performer:

TV Theme

Parody Song Title:

"The Amiright One-ster"

Parody Written by:

Michael McVey

The Lyrics

Lemme tell you all a story about a son of a gun
He votes on our spoofs, givin' everybody ones
He doesn't have the guts to ever tell us why
And we all wish the wimp would just go bye-bye

Coward, that is.

Yellow Chicken.

No guts.

All us honest folk would love to kick him in the rear
We just wish he'd leave, take his ass on out of here
Amiright is not anywhere he outta be
I'm sure there's a place for him in Washington DC!

Naysayers, that is.

Spoilsports.

Partypoopers.

THE AMIRIGHT ONE-STER!!!
2004 Michael W. McVey

Spoofs and Parodies Yahoo Group

Your Vote & Comment Counts

The parody authors spend a lot of time writing parodies for the website and they appreciate feedback in the form of votes and comments. Please take some time to leave a comment below about this parody.

Place Your Vote

 LittleLots
Matches Pace of
Original Song: 
How Funny: 
Overall Score: 



In order for your vote to count, you need to hit the 'Place Your Vote' button.
 

Voting Results

 
Pacing: 5.0
How Funny: 5.0
Overall Rating: 5.0

Total Votes: 2

Voting Breakdown

The following represent how many people voted for each category.

    Pacing How Funny Overall Rating
 1   0
 0
 0
 
 2   0
 0
 0
 
 3   0
 0
 0
 
 4   0
 0
 0
 
 5   2
 2
 2
 

User Comments

Comments are subject to review, and can be removed by the administration of the site at any time and for any reason.

2nz - March 17, 2004 - Report this comment
Good 1-basher here. Aren't there supposed to be three stanzas? Well, I can't remember, and it works as it is, so 5's and enjoy your week.
alvin rhodes - March 17, 2004 - Report this comment
good one, i'm givin' ya 5s....but i bet at least one person gives ya a 1
... - March 17, 2004 - Report this comment
Loved it! This was a great one; it gets a perfect score!

And don't let him come back now, ya hear?
Paul Robinson - March 17, 2004 - Report this comment
Michael - pretty good "1", here.
Michael McVey - March 17, 2004 - Report this comment
No, 2nz, the original has two stanzas. Thanks for the rave reviews, though :)-- MM
Guy - March 17, 2004 - Report this comment
Weeee doogies, that's gonna right ruffle that one fellers feathers alright. Jethro, git me my shootin' iron so I kin shoot me three little old holes through this here monitor screen into that there "place your votes" target into that score called "lots". I think that MM feller would thank us kindly fer doin' that.
Adagio - March 17, 2004 - Report this comment
Michael...loved it! um...maybe 1-guy will take a hint? 5's
Mr X - March 17, 2004 - Report this comment
Great job! I've always "1"-dered why there are people who give ones; it makes absolutely no sense. Anyway, I give this parody fives.
Michael McVey - March 17, 2004 - Report this comment
Mr. X, I have no problem with someone rating a parody a "1" if they truly don't think it's a good parody and are willing to give honest criticism on why that think that, and what the author needs to do to improve. That's not being a coward, it's being just the opposite. My problem is when someone targets parodies that are getting good ratings from the rest of the audience and gives it 1-1-1, without leaving any comments, just to bring the rating down. And I think most of us here on amiright.com have a problem with that. -- MM
Michael McVey - March 17, 2004 - Report this comment
Well, he's been spotted! -- MM
Mr X - March 17, 2004 - Report this comment
I know that... but I think you may have misunderstood me. But still, if someone doesn't LIKE a parody, that's no reason to sabotage the ratings; especially the pacing score. I've said this before (and I'm sure others have said it too): if most of us agree that a parody meets the pacing more or less (i.e., most everyone gives it 5 in that category), what's the rationale of voting 1 in that category? If I don't like a parody, but it has perfect pacing, I would vote 5-1-1. As a matter of fact, there have been a few parodies on this site where I've given that rating.
Troy - March 18, 2004 - Report this comment
Hahahahaha that was a good one!!! All 5's from me mate!!! Yeah I've copped the all 1's on some of my parodies from that stupid wanker who doesn't even bother explaining why, I hope he just gets on his bike and piss off!!!
Serafina - March 18, 2004 - Report this comment
I think that Mr.X makes a very good observation; if most of us give a high score for pacing, then to give it a low score for pacing is rather a dishonest vote (for lack of a better word). But voting ones in the other two categories is another issue. By the way, I voted 5-5-5 on this parody; it was very nicely written.
Michael McVey - March 22, 2004 - Report this comment
Y'all make some good points, and to be honest, I haven't yet encountered any original work on amiright bad enough to deserve a 1. I think the worst I've given anyone is either a 2-3-3 or a 3-2-3, depending on whether I thought the pacing was way off, or the parody was just stale. There is only one situation where I've ever given a 1-1-1, and that was when someone tried to pass off a Weird Al Yankovic parody as his own work. I will not hesitate to "flunk" someone for plagiarism. -- MM
kozar - March 23, 2004 - Report this comment
I think what Mr.X and Serafina are trying to say is, "A vote is a terrible thing to waste." I agree with that 100%.
Phil Alexander - March 26, 2004 - Report this comment
May sound strange, but I've never heard the original... but I reckon I can guess from this how it runs :-) Yep, I'd agree with you, MM.

The author of the parody has authorized comments, and wants YOUR feedback.

Link To This Page

The address of this page is: http://www.amiright.com/parody/60s/tvtheme3.shtml For help, see the examples of how to link to this page.

This is view # 891